Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991583›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study.

Hussein H Twabi, Wakumanya Sibande, Owen Mhango, Takondwa Charles Msosa, Chikumbutso Chipandwe, Madalo Mukoka, Moses Kumwenda, Vanitha Sivalingam, Dennis Solomon, Chisomo Msefula and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hussein H TwabiKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-296X
Wakumanya SibandeKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-1532
Owen MhangoKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Takondwa Charles MsosaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Chikumbutso ChipandweKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2778-390X
Madalo MukokaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Moses KumwendaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-7330
Vanitha SivalingamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-565X
Dennis SolomonThyolo District Hospital, Ministry of Health, Thyolo, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9586-0761
Chisomo MsefulaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
David LissauerInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Marriott NliwasaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Maria Lisa OdlandInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the roll-out of cervical cancer screening within routine health facilities, uptake of cervical cancer screening in Malawi remains low due to factors such as privacy concerns, stigma, and distance to health facility. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing offers a viable alternative to provider-delivered sampling, resolving issues with accessibility and privacy related barriers. However, there is limited understanding of the acceptability of self-sampling among women in low-income settings. We aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, and acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening. We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study among ten purposively sampled women screening for cervical cancer at a rural hospital in Malawi. Data collection instruments and the thematic analytical approach were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Key constructs that were central to this analysis included affective attitude, burden, self-efficacy, intervention coherence, and perceived effectiveness. Self-sampling emerged as a culturally and socially acceptable diagnostic practice by the women, mediated by emic values of privacy, bodily autonomy, and convenience. Women valued the ability to autonomously collect samples, which allowed them to circumvent discomfort and perceived invasiveness linked to speculum use, especially by male clinicians. Sociocultural barriers such as limited literacy levels, poor access to transport, and a lack of spousal approval restricted broader acceptability. Facilitators of acceptability included comprehension of the intervention, confidence in the self-sampling process, and the potential of the intervention to increase screening uptake, reduce cervical cancer screening-related stigma and reduce healthcare worker burden. Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening is an acceptable and promising alternative for improving the uptake of screening among women in Malawi and similar low-income countries. Scale-up of this approach will require addressing socio-cultural barriers through optimising instructional materials, engaging male partners, and leveraging community health workers for scaled community implementation via task-sharing.

Identifiers

PMID40991583
PMCPMC12459778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.