ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the roll-out of cervical cancer screening within routine health facilities, uptake of cervical cancer screening in Malawi remains low due to factors such as privacy concerns, stigma, and distance to health facility. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing offers a viable alternative to provider-delivered sampling, resolving issues with accessibility and privacy related barriers. However, there is limited understanding of the acceptability of self-sampling among women in low-income settings. We aimed to assess women's perceptions, experiences, and acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening. We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study among ten purposively sampled women screening for cervical cancer at a rural hospital in Malawi. Data collection instruments and the thematic analytical approach were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Key constructs that were central to this analysis included affective attitude, burden, self-efficacy, intervention coherence, and perceived effectiveness. Self-sampling emerged as a culturally and socially acceptable diagnostic practice by the women, mediated by emic values of privacy, bodily autonomy, and convenience. Women valued the ability to autonomously collect samples, which allowed them to circumvent discomfort and perceived invasiveness linked to speculum use, especially by male clinicians. Sociocultural barriers such as limited literacy levels, poor access to transport, and a lack of spousal approval restricted broader acceptability. Facilitators of acceptability included comprehension of the intervention, confidence in the self-sampling process, and the potential of the intervention to increase screening uptake, reduce cervical cancer screening-related stigma and reduce healthcare worker burden. Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening is an acceptable and promising alternative for improving the uptake of screening among women in Malawi and similar low-income countries. Scale-up of this approach will require addressing socio-cultural barriers through optimising instructional materials, engaging male partners, and leveraging community health workers for scaled community implementation via task-sharing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.