SynthesisPloS one2025
The impact of cultural frame switching on wellbeing- systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Language as a cultural trigger: a study of pointing gestures in Bengali-English bilinguals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis pre-registered review synthesised findings from studies examining individuals' experiences of cultural frame switching (CFS) and its potential impact on well-being.
backgroundCFS is a strategy used by bi/multicultural individuals to navigate daily life by shifting between cultural frameworks in response to environmental cues, influencing thoughts, emotions, and behaviours.
methodEleven studies were identified through systematic searches across four electronic databases, with a total sample size of 2,657. The JBI approach to qualitative synthesis was applied, alongside evidence synthesis for the quantitative findings.
resultsThe findings suggest that CFS may influence well-being in both positive and negative ways. Potential benefits include enhanced personal relationships, workplace well-being and success, cultural adjustment, and identity navigation. However, CFS may also contribute to identity conflict and associated distress, lower satisfaction with life, perceived discrimination, reduced self-esteem, diminished authenticity, and increased psychological symptoms such as anxiety and low mood.
conclusionsWhile CFS appears to have both beneficial and adverse effects on well-being, the limited research in this area makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Further investigation is needed to better understand these mechanisms, why certain individuals experience more challenges, and how to mitigate potential negative impacts. Expanding research in this area could inform future models of support for individuals from minority and multicultural backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.