ArticlePloS one2025
Removal efficiency of pharmaceuticals during the wastewater treatment process: Emission and environmental risk assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incorporating a Screening-Level Risk Quotient (RQ_screen) for Assessing Human Health Risk of Pharmaceutical Residues in Consumption Water.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Mood Altering Waters: Multidimensional Profiling and Chiral Characterization of Antidepressants in Effluent-Impacted Waterways.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Nano-iron-modified pomegranate peel powder for rapid and recyclable removal of acetaminophen.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plant chloroplasts enable high-yield and cost-effective production of the engineered bacterial enzyme CueO-MacHis as a technical protein via transient expression inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the Ecotoxicological Effects of Emerging Drug and Dye Pollutants on Plant-Soil Systems Pre- and Post-Photocatalytic Wastewater Treatment.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The release of pharmaceuticals into the environment is a major concern. These compounds enter waterways through the effluent of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, most WWTPs using mechanical-biological processes based on activated sludge (CAS) are unable to effectively remove pharmaceuticals. Consequently, pharmaceuticals end up in surface water, seawater and groundwater. While some pharmaceuticals break down or degrade, most remain unchanged and eventually become persistent in the environment, retaining their biological activity even at extremely low concentrations. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence, removal efficiency, environmental discharge and ecological risks of selected pharmaceuticals in municipal WWTPs. Samples were collected from six WWTPs serving over 200,000 people. Concentrations of pharmaceuticals were analysed using the LC-MS/MS method. Removal efficiency was assessed using mass balance calculations for pharmaceuticals in the influent, effluent and sludge. The potential ecological risk posed by individual pharmaceuticals was then evaluated based on the risk quotient (RQ). Concentrations of pharmaceuticals ranged from 7 ng/L to 1,019 ng/L in the influent, from 9 ng/L to 2,266 ng/L in the effluent and from 8.5 μg/kg to 406 μg/kg dw in the sewage sludge. All six WWTPs released pharmaceuticals into the environment. Naproxen, salicylic acid and ketoprofen were the only compounds effectively removed during treatment. Fluoxetine and loratadine posed the greatest risk to aquatic organisms. These findings will lay the groundwork for further research into the inactivation of pharmaceutical active substances and their metabolites in sewage and sludge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.