ArticlePloS one2025
Providing psychological support to people impacted by terminal illness: A mixed methods study of hospice staff perceived competence, confidence and training needs.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychological distress is common amongst people with a terminal illness. While mental health specialists have a role in assessment and management of those with complex psychological problems, hospice clinicians provide psychological support to most patients and families.
aimTo describe current practices relating to the provision of psychological support by hospice clinicians, and to explore perceived competence, confidence and training needs in relation to this aspect of their role.
designWe used a parallel mixed methods research design. An online questionnaire consisting of closed and free-text questions was emailed to 273 hospices in the UK and the Republic of Ireland between May and June 2023. SETTING/
participantsParticipants included nurses, doctors, and allied health professionals employed by a hospice. Quantitative data was analysed descriptively using SPSS 27, and free-text data was analysed thematically guided by the framework method.
results151 hospice staff completed the questionnaire. Most (81%) reported that they regularly screen for psychological distress, but clinical judgement, as opposed to use of a validated screening tool, was most common. Respondents reported confidence and competence in many areas. Overall, 72% strongly agreed they were willing to explore difficult subject matter. However, only 25% strongly agreed they were confident in differentiating level of psychological need, and 36% reported they could not arrange appropriate psychological support when needed. Almost all (95%) agreed that training in psychological support would enhance their practice. Individual and family factors such as denial, communication challenges and family conflict were barriers to providing psychological support. Systemic factors were time constraints, prioritisation of physical symptoms and limited access to mental health specialists.
conclusionHospice staff report that they are confident in providing basic psychological support. However, there was a desire for further training in this aspect of care. Clearer guidance on referral criteria for specialist psychological support is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.