ArticlePloS one2025
A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of pain in children to inform pain assessment methods.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalizing Trauma-Informed Principles to Build Safe, Inclusive, and Equitable Patient Partnerships in Pediatric Pain Research.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Health literacy scale for English-speaking children: translation and validation of the HLS-Child-Q15-EN.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain is a common experience associated with healthcare for children, who often recall it as the worst part of hospitalisation. Several factors make assessment of pain more challenging in children. Families have previously identified the development of improved tools to assess pain in children as a key priority. We therefore sough to investigate the nature of this experience from the perspective of children and their parents to inform the development of such tools.
methodsTo explore the phenomenology of children's acute pain to inform improved assessment, we conducted a qualitative study with combined (children aged ≥4 and parents) semi-structured interviews of families with children aged 0-16 years at a tertiary paediatric hospital in Western Australia. The interviews were analysed using the Framework Method.
resultsWe recruited 27 families, stratified across <6 years, 6-11 years, and 12 + years child age groups. Children and parents demonstrated a range of insights and a wide diversity of ideas about pain. The key themes were: pain is a familiar part of normal life that serves an important function; children communicate pain with others, both verbally and non-verbally; children relate pain to a range of other sensory experiences, with some common experiences identified such as the colour red representing pain; existing pain scales are difficult for children due to limited experiences of extremes of pain; and pain scales could be improved by using more familiar or attractive content or technology.
conclusionsChildren demonstrated diverse experiences of pain and sensory associations. These findings can inform the development of paediatric pain assessment methodology. The novelty and adaptability offered by digital platforms may assist in creating individualised and engaging pain assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.