ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
Coccygodynia—Diagnosis and Treatment.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy on Pain Severity and Functional Status in Patients With Coccydynia: A Prospective Study
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Landmark-Guided (Blind) Dextrose Prolotherapy on Pain Severity and Functional Status in Patients With Coccydynia: A Retrospective Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with coccygodynia have chronic pain in the area of the coccyx that is worse on sitting. The prevalence of this condition is unknown, but women are affected much more frequently than men, in a 5:1 ratio.
methodsIn this narrative review, we present the relevant diagnostic techniques and conservative, interventional, and surgical treatment options.
resultsThe mobility of the coccyx is assessed with dynamic x-rays in the seated and upright positions. Although there have been a number of small-scale randomized therapeutic trials, the evidence concerning the treatment of coccygodynia is derived mainly from observational studies. Manual therapies such as pelvic-floor training, the use of elastic therapeutic tape, analgesic drugs, and sitting cushions have reportedly yielded mixed results, with limited to clinically relevant efficacy. Interventional techniques, including local steroid infiltration, ganglion impar block, and radiofrequency therapies, can markedly improve symptoms for many patients. In intractable cases, surgical removal of the coccyx (coccygectomy) is an option. In a meta-analysis, 84% of patients obtained relief of pain and 76% returned to work. After at least 36 months of follow-up, the mean degree of pain relief was rated at 5.4 on a scale of 1 to 10. Wound dehiscence arose in 5% of patients, and 3% underwent repeated surgery.
conclusionCoccygodynia requires special diagnostic evaluation, including dynamic imaging and interdisciplinary pain assessment. Patients with coccygodynia are at risk for pain chronification. In such cases, multimodal evaluation is indicated. Conservative treatment should be tried first, potentially including interventional methods of reducing pain. Coccygectomy should only be considered in intractable cases with demonstrated instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.