Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991337›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025

Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adults and Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease: A United Kingdom and Ireland Survey.

Chris J Bond, Timothy J Jones, J Andreas Hoschtitzky, Nicola Viola, Mark H D Danton, Nigel E Drury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris J BondDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5788-2935
Timothy J JonesDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-3496
J Andreas HoschtitzkyDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital and Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-2116
Nicola ViolaDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Mark H D DantonDepartment of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0866-2394
Nigel E DruryDepartment of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-6683

Funding

Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital Charity 37-6-337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany models of bioprosthesis are available for pulmonary valve replacement in adults with congenital heart disease, but there is a lack of randomized evidence to guide practice. We surveyed congenital cardiac surgeons to establish current practice and willingness to change within a clinical trial.

methodsAn online survey was sent to all consultant congenital cardiac surgeons in adult congenital centres in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Information was sought on preferred prostheses, factors influencing decision-making, implant technique, postoperative anticoagulation, practice variations in adolescents, and willingness to randomize patients to different prostheses within a trial.

resultsResponses were obtained from 27 (69%) surgeons. A total of 19 (70%) preferred an Edwards bovine pericardial valve, most commonly the Inspiris Resilia (7, 26%). Only 2 (7%) favoured the Hancock II valve; the remaining 6 (22%) preferred pulmonary homografts. Data regarding long-term freedom from reintervention (23, 85%) was the most important factor influencing prosthesis choice. A total of 22 (81%) surgeons were willing to randomize adult patients to either a bovine pericardial valve or a porcine xenograft in a clinical trial, with Perimount Magna Ease and Hancock II being the most acceptable, respectively. Willingness to randomize dropped to 11 (41%) surgeons for adolescent patients.

conclusionsThis survey demonstrates heterogeneity in the choice of pulmonary valve prosthesis. Combined with a lack of evidence from clinical trials, our findings support the presence of clinical equipoise. Most surgeons are willing to change practice, suggesting that a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized controlled trial comparing bovine pericardial versus porcine xenograft for pulmonary valve replacement in adults is feasible.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Pulmonary ValveSurgeonsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnimalsHealth Care SurveysHumansIrelandMaleProsthesis Designbioprosthesiscardiac surgerycongenital heart diseasepericardial valvepulmonary valve replacementxenograft valve

Identifiers

PMID40991337
PMCPMC12501497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.