ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Assessing tissue-specific gene expression of essential genes from human and mouse.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A gene is defined as essential when its functional loss compromises an organism's viability. Identifying essential genes is critical for identifying the components that regulate a biological system. Advances in gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 provide a capacity to interrogate a genome to elucidate the genes that are essential. However, these techniques are often applied for a single-cell line and rarely probed at a level of a tissue or organ. The recent availability of large-scale single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) atlases provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate essential gene expression in a more comprehensive context. Our study leverages information from benchmarking datasets, single-cell tissue atlases, and databases of essential genes, to develop a method, scEssentials, that uses a statistical framework to investigate the robustness and specificity of essential genes across multiple cell types. Using scEssentials, mouse and human models showed consistently high expression and exhibited limited variability across more than 60 cell types. We demonstrate a substantial number of significantly correlated gene pairs that produce densely connected co-expression networks with functional annotation. Finally, we develop a score to quantify the relative essentiality of genes within scEssentials, further validating their significant association with gene mutation frequency and chromatin accessibility. Using ageing as an application, we demonstrate how scEssentials identifies robust gene expression profiles. Only one-fifth of scEssentials genes showed significant ageing-related differential expression among age groups. Collectively, the robustness of scEssentials serves as a reference for analysing scRNA-seq data and provides insight into the heterogeneous nature such as ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.