Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991311›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2026

Conceptual trait associations predict impressions of highly variable faces.

Barbora Illithova, Andrew W Young, Mingyuan Chu, Clare A M Sutherland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Conceptual trait associations predict impressions of highly variable faces.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbora IllithovaSchool of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2923-9345
Andrew W YoungDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Mingyuan ChuSchool of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Clare A M SutherlandSchool of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Australian Research CouncilExperimental Psychology SocietySchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People form consequential trait judgements from seeing others' faces. The influential dynamic interactive theory suggests that trait judgements reflect the combined use of visual cues from faces (e.g. smiling looks trustworthy) with individuals' own conceptual trait associations (e.g. believing trustworthy people are also kind), thus far supported for impressions of highly constricted neutral faces in the US cultural context. Here, we provide a stringent new test of the dynamic interactive theory by examining whether conceptual trait associations predict impressions of highly variable everyday faces, within and across cultures and individuals. Study 1 shows that conceptual trait associations predict impressions of highly variable everyday faces in British perceivers. Study 2 demonstrates that British and Chinese perceivers' conceptual trait associations (expressed in English and Mandarin, respectively) predict impressions of highly variable White and Asian faces similarly. Study 3 finds that individuals' conceptual trait associations predict their impressions of highly variable face images. Together, we show for the first time that conceptual trait associations predict impressions even when faces provide rich visual cues and extend this understanding beyond Western perceivers, faces and languages. Our findings thus offer independent support for dynamic interactive theory in naturalistic impressions across cultures.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionJudgmentSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonCuesFemaleHumansMaleUnited KingdomYoung Adultconceptual trait associationscross‐culturaldynamic interactive theoryface impressionsindividual differencesperson perception

Identifiers

PMID40991311
PMCPMC12783882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.