ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2025
Peer relationships and student motivation: Discussion of methodological approaches.
Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peer relationships and student motivation: Discussion of methodological approaches.The British journal of educational psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs theoretical perspectives on peer relationships and motivation expand, new methodological challenges emerge in capturing the complex, dynamic and context-sensitive nature of these associations.
aimsThis discussion paper reviews nine studies from this special issue to identify methodological innovations and limitations in current research on peer relationships and academic motivation. SAMPLES AND
methodsA broad range of methodological approaches is compared, including research design (quantitative vs. qualitative), operationalization of constructs, levels of analysis, timing of study and strategies for modelling change.
resultsSeveral methodological challenges are identified, including defining the target population, assessing motivational constructs at both trait and state levels and distinguishing between perceived and actual peer data. Additional concerns include representativeness, measurement specificity and the need for analytical models that capture intraindividual developmental trajectories at different levels of analysis.
conclusionThe paper highlights diverse methodological approaches that offer deeper insights into the dynamic relationships between peer relationships and academic motivation and may inform future studies on possible methodological approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.