ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Validating the maternal near miss review operational guidelines for teaching institutes in India: A retrospective five-year study.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objective The World Health Organization working group defined maternal near miss (MNM) as women who nearly died but survived a complication that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy. Our objective was to investigate the incidence of MNM events, identify the associated risk factors, and evaluate their outcomes. Additionally, we aimed to validate the MNM Review Operational Guidelines by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), Government of India, as a tool for medical colleges for MNM audits. Methods A five-year retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The study included 324 patients who were hospitalized over these five years and met the inclusion criteria of the MOHFW MNM operational guidelines. Results Our audit over five years revealed a maternal near-miss incidence ratio (NMIR) of 46.6 per 1,000 live births and a near-miss rate (NMR) of 44.6 per 1,000 obstetric admissions. Among the identified MNM cases, haemorrhage was the most common condition leading to MNM events, accounting for 250 out of 324 cases (77.1 %). Interpretation & conclusions The MNM cases act as an indirect marker of the quality of maternal healthcare services. Using a common operational guideline for monitoring MNM cases will simplify data reporting and streamline documentation across all teaching institutes, allowing meta-analysis of nationwide data in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.