ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Patient Perspectives on Identifiers for Immigrant Patients in Electronic Health Records.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data invisibility in United States national healthcare datasets: implications for immigrant health equity.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Patient Perspectives on Identifiers for Immigrant Patients in Electronic Health Records.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying immigrant patients within Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems has significant equity-related implications in care and research of immigrant populations in the United States (U.S.). This study builds upon previous work that utilized interviews with key stakeholders to determine effective, acceptable, and ethical identifiers for immigrant patients in EHRs; language, country of origin, time in the U.S., and race/ethnicity were determined suitable for use. Building upon these conclusions, we conducted interviews with non-English language preference (NELP) immigrant patients in the Emergency Department setting to glean their perspectives on the use of identifiers for immigrant patients in EHRs. Individuals endorsed language and country of origin as useful identifiers, but also expressed a general lack of understanding regarding what is documented in the EHR and why, along with significant concerns about potential implications related to the documentation of sensitive information. Given the rapidly shifting anti-immigrant policy landscape in the U.S., we maintain that providers seeking to utilize these identifiers to advance equity-centered clinical care and research must also exercise caution and consider all potential uses of these identifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40991205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.