ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Development of an interpretable machine learning model to predict short-term bleeding risk in patients receiving dual antithrombotic therapy following cardiac surgery.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel predictive model for evaluating thrombus regression in postpartum venous thromboembolism patients.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based individualized prediction: risk assessment of retinopathy in preterm infants at high altitude.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBleeding is a serious complication in cardiac surgery, especially among patients receiving combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. Current prediction models rarely include those undergoing both valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or account for postoperative factors and dual antithrombotic therapy, limiting their clinical utility.
aimThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for the individualized prediction of bleeding events within three months after discharge in patients receiving warfarin plus aspirin following combined CABG and valve surgery.
methodData from 499 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery and received combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy between June 2019 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned to training (70%) and internal validation (30%) cohorts. Eleven key bleeding predictors were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. Seven machine learning algorithms, logistic regression, decision tree, random forest (RF), support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and k-nearest neighbors, were subsequently trained using these predictors. The model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and Brier score. External validation was performed in a temporally independent cohort of 93 patients. Model interpretability was assessed through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), which were used to visualize both global and individual risk contributions.
resultsEleven clinical variables, including anemia, diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, age, postoperative drainage, previous bleeding, stroke, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rates and intraoperative bleeding, were identified as predictors. Among the models, the RF algorithm demonstrated the best performance (internal validation: AUC = 0.85, accuracy = 0.80, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.82, PPV = 0.64, NPV = 0.89 and F1-score = 0.69). In the external validation, the RF model maintained strong performance (AUC = 0.82, accuracy = 0.73, sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.72, PPV = 0.44, NPV = 0.92 and F1-score = 0.56). Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the model, and SHAP visualizations provided a transparent interpretation of individualized bleeding risks.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical utility of ML-based prediction of short-term bleeding risk in cardiac surgery patients on dual antithrombotic therapy. The RF model enables individualized risk assessment, with SHAP interpretation supporting clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.