ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025
Care of Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Role of Geriatric Assessment.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients: An Updated Canadian Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of treatment outcomes for AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy before and after the implementation of VEN/AZA - a retrospective cohort study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementOlder adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face disproportionately poor outcomes, driven by a combination of high-risk disease biology and functional vulnerabilities that are often overlooked by conventional oncology assessments. Geriatric assessment (GA) offers a multidimensional approach to uncover these impairments-spanning physical function, cognitive status, comorbidity burden, and emotional well-being-and provides critical information that independently predicts survival and treatment tolerance. Early studies demonstrate that GA can personalize treatment intensity decisions, inform supportive care interventions, and improve quality of life, yet its incorporation into routine AML care remains limited. Barriers to broader implementation include the need for streamlined workflows, clinician training, and large-scale validation. Future efforts should focus on integrating GA with biological markers of aging and disease to refine risk stratification, and leveraging digital tools and artificial intelligence to enhance feasibility and scalability. Ultimately, optimizing the management of older adults with AML will require a personalized, goal-concordant approach that combines GA-driven risk assessment with emerging therapeutic and supportive care strategies, ensuring that treatment intensity is matched to both disease biology and individual patient resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40991119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.