ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025
A shared feature between the salient distractor and target turns early quitting effect to delayed quitting effect when the target is absent.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a seminal paper, Moher (Psychol Sci 31(1):31-42, 10.1177/0956797619886809, 2020) reported that a salient distractor induced observers to quit the search early when the target was absent and increased the error rate when the target was present. This early quitting effect (EQE) was considered to impact real-world target detection. We were interested in how the EQE would be influenced when the similarity between the target and the salient distractor increased. This may more closely resemble real-world situations and may reveal underlying mechanisms of the EQE, as increased similarity could either raise costs of attention suppression, leading to the disappearance or even reversal of the EQE, or trigger the sense of effort in searching, resulting in the appearance of the EQE. Through two experiments, we demonstrate that the effect of a salient distractor on detecting a target was limited by the similarity of the target and the salient distractor. In Experiment 1, we conducted a task with a salient distractor that differed in color, size, and orientation from the target to replicate the EQE. We found that participants reacted faster in target-absent trials and less accurately in target-present trials, thus validating the experiment. However, when the similarity of the salient distractor and target was increased by sharing the same orientation feature in Experiment 2, the EQE did not occur. Specifically, regardless of target presence, a salient distractor delayed the search time and did not influence the error rate. These findings support that attention suppression, rather than the sense of search effort, is a subprocess of the EQE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.