ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Three Characterized Probiotics from Dairy Sources-Weissella confusa (ProY 5.1), Enterococcus lactis (ProY 5.3), and Leuconostoc lactis (RM 2.1)-Exhibit Potential for Antidiarrheal Effects.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are beneficial live microorganisms that may provide secure management of several diseases, such as diarrhea. The current research aims to assess the antidiarrheal activity of potential probiotics by utilizing in vitro and in vivo approaches. Bacterial strains were isolated from dairy products and screened for probiotic characterization, with four strains, viz., Weissella confusa (ProY 5.1), Enterococcus lactis (ProY 5.3), Leuconostoc lactis (RM 2.1), and Bacillus subtilis (ProY 11.3), selected based on in vitro approaches. These strains demonstrated non-hemolytic properties, acidic resistance, tolerance to bile salt and phenol, strong adherence rate, probiotic activity, and antimicrobial activity against six enteric pathogens. Potential strains were identified by applying molecular techniques: MALDI-TOF and whole genome sequencing. In vivo experiments on castor oil-induced diarrheal Swiss albino mice showed a positive impact when compared to loperamide and bismuth subsalicylate as positive controls, whereas the PBS + MRS broth was used as a negative control. Screened ProY 5.1, ProY 5.3, and RM 2.1 significantly lengthened latency periods and reduced diarrheal symptoms (p < 0.005). Comparatively low antidiarrheal activity was found in the ProY 11.3 isolate. The combination of candidate probiotics exhibited stronger activity compared to the individual ones. In conclusion, the three strains might be potential probiotic candidates for managing diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40991099What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.