Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991060›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Clinical and discharge outcomes in an acute palliative care unit located in a comprehensive cancer center.

Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Claudio Adile, Giorgio Sapienza, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alesssandra Casuccio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association of a standardized painless ward model with cancer pain control and hospitalization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastiano MercadanteMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy. terapiadeldolore@lamaddalenanet.it.
Yasmine GrassiMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Claudio AdileMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Giorgio SapienzaMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Alessio Lo CascioMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Alesssandra CasuccioMain Regional of Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was, other than assessing clinical outcomes after a comprehensive palliative care treatment in APCU, to report the activity and functioning of APCU in influencing subsequent care trajectory and settings of patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsA consecutive sample of patients with cancer who were admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) was prospectively assessed. All patients underwent comprehensive palliative care treatment. At admission (T0), patients' demographics, reasons for admission, referral, and recent anticancer treatments were recorded, along with whether they were on/off treatment or uncertain. Subsequent referrals to next care settings and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered. Symptom intensity was measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).

resultsFive-hundred and twenty patients were surveyed. Clinical deterioration was the most frequent indication for APCU admission. Most admissions were planned (60.8%). At discharge, a significant decrease in the number of "on therapy" patients was reported, and concomitantly, the number of "off-therapy" patients increased (p < 0.0005) in comparison with data recorded at admission. A significant number of patients was assigned to a palliative care setting, including home palliative care or hospice at the time of discharge (p < 0.0005). All ESAS items that significantly improved during admission were significant. Being "off therapy" was independently associated with a lower Karnofsky (p = 0.002), higher global ESAS at discharge (p = 0.032), and discharge to a palliative setting (hospice or home palliative care) (p < 0.0005).

conclusionData from the present study has shown that APCU results in a crossroad for patients with advanced cancer, allowing selection for transition of care.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient DischargeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAcute palliative care unitAdvanced cancerHome palliative careHospice care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.