Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy of non-ablative vaginal erbium laser for rUTI prevention in postmenopausal women.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Microecological Imbalance, Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Urinary manifestations of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a review of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of vaginal erbium laser (VEL) for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) prevention in postmenopausal women (PMW). 80 PMW with past histories of rUTI were recruited and randomized into local estrogen therapy (LET) or VEL group. The LET group was prescribed 12 weeks of vaginal estrogen, while treatment in the VEL group consisted of three VEL sessions at a 30-day interval. Primary outcomes were the number of UTI episodes and the percentage of cured and improved participants. Vaginal pH, lactobacillus flora, and vaginal health index score (VHIS) were assessed as secondary outcomes. The actual number of cumulative UTI episodes in VEL and LET were significantly lower than predictive numbers. No significant difference was found in the percentages of cured and improved participants between the two groups. Persistent improvement of vaginal health was observed in VEL. Only 54.8% of participants in LET still maintained vaginal lactobacillus predominance at the follow-up endpoint compared with 93.3% in VEL (p = 0.002). Consistently and significantly lower vaginal pH and higher VHIS scores were observed in VEL compared to LET at the same time-points. In comparison to vaginal estrogen, VEL showed a non-inferior and more sustained effect for rUTI prevention in PMW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40991055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.