ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2025
Diagnostic performance of circulating microRNA signatures for differentiating tuberculosis disease from tuberculosis infection.
Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As regulators of innate and adaptive immunity, microRNAs (miRNAs) could aid in the discrimination between tuberculosis disease (TB) and (latent) TB infection (TBI). We analysed 754 circulating miRNAs in participants diagnosed with TB and TBI using TaqMan™ Advanced miRNA Human A and B cards. MiRNAs were normalized exogenously and endogenously via geometric means of selected reference miRNAs. Expression analysis was used to identify miRNAs that were significantly differentially expressed between individuals with TB and those with TBI. We utilised recursive feature elimination with a Random Forest model to identify the miRNAs most effective at discriminating TB from TBI and subsequently validated the miRNA in another group. 95 persons diagnosed with TB or TBI was divided into a discovery group (n = 36) and a validation group (n = 59). In the discovery group, we identified 495 distinct miRNAs in 36 persons with TB or TBI and by recursive feature elimination identified hsa-miR-148a-3p, hsa-miR-204-5p and hsa-miR-584-5p and created a three-miRNA-diagnostic model. In the validation group, the three-miRNA-diagnostic model had poorer performance. Expression analysis revealed 13 significantly differentially expressed miRNAs, including hsa-miR-148a-3p and hsa-miR-204-5p. Subsequent analysis in a validation group consisting of 59 persons revealed that six of the 14 miRNAs, including hsa-miR-148a-3p, exhibited the same pattern, albeit without statistical significance. Three circulating miRNAs showed potential for differentiating TB from TBI in the discovery cohort, but these differences were less pronounced in the validation cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.