ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) models in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, metastasis detection, prognosis, and treatment response prediction.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Review
- A nomogram based on dual-layer spectral detector CT-derived 40-KeV virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps for preoperative prediction of regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Association between induced organ atrophy assessed by artificial intelligence-generated automatic segmentation and efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Exhaustive Review of the Literature and Future Prospectives.Cancers · 2025Review
- A new paradigm in postoperative colorectal cancer surveillance: integrating advanced imaging and multi-omics.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the world. Radiomics and radiogenomics are utilized for the high-throughput quantification of features from medical images, providing non-invasive means to characterize cancer heterogeneity and gain insight into the underlying biology. Such radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI)-methods have demonstrated great potential to improve the accuracy of CRC diagnosis and staging, to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, to aid in the detection of lymph node and hepatic metastasis, and to predict the effects of therapy and prognosis for patients. This review presents the latest evidence on the clinical applications of radiomics models based on different imaging modalities in CRC. We also discuss the challenges facing clinical translation, including differences in image acquisition, issues related to reproducibility, a lack of standardization, and limited external validation. Given the progress of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, radiomics is expected to have an important effect on the personalized treatment of CRC and contribute to a more accurate and individualized clinical decision-making in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40991016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.