ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Interventional radiological management of traumatic pelvic, retroperitoneal and gastrointestinal hemorrhages].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Role of interventional radiology in mass casualty incidents : Current state of evidence exemplified by the attack on the Magdeburg Christmas market].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbolization via interventional radiology (IR) plays a critical role in the management of trauma patients and is effective in controlling arterial hemorrhaging in the pelvis, retroperitoneum, and gastrointestinal tract.
objectiveTo evaluate the role of IR in the management of traumatic arterial bleeding in the pelvic, retroperitoneal and gastrointestinal regions. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the current evidence regarding the indications, procedural techniques and results of embolization following trauma in the named regions.
resultsThe decision to perform embolization is determined individually and interdisciplinary based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). In cases of arterial bleeding, embolization following pelvic trauma is a key pillar of treatment. Posttraumatic retroperitoneal renal embolization is indicated as the method of choice in cases of traumatic arterial bleeding without devascularization or fragmentation of the kidney. Although there is a lack of robust data and clear guidelines for embolization in traumatic gastrointestinal and other retroperitoneal hemorrhages, evidence from nontraumatic cases suggests a high therapeutic potential. The endovascular techniques used in trauma closely mirror those employed in nontraumatic vascular occlusion interventions in these regions. DISCUSSION: Targeted embolization effectively controls traumatic bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40990976What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.