Trial reportThe oncologist2025
Phase II single-arm study of palbociclib and cetuximab in anti-EGFR naïve patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03446157 (Phase II Single-arm Study of the Combination of Palbociclib and Cetuximab in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Single-arm Study of the Combination of Palbociclib and Cetuximab in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CDK4/6-targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers: from resistance mechanisms to immuno-combination strategies guided by biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandard therapy for patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type (WT), microsatellite stable (MSS), L-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) often includes chemotherapy with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as cetuximab. Preclinical studies suggest the role of CDK4/6 activity downstream of EGFR as a possible resistance mechanism to anti-EGFR therapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that the addition of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib would increase the disease control rate of patients with anti-EGFR naïve KRAS/NRAS/BRAF-WT mCRC.
methodsLCCC1717 was a phase II trial with a Simon two-stage design in which patients with KRAS/NRAS WT mCRC having progressed on at least two lines of therapy were given palbociclib and cetuximab. The primary end point was four-month disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). If six or more patients achieved disease control at four months, the study would continue enrollment, otherwise the study would be discontinued.
resultsA total of 12 subjects were enrolled, 11 of whom had left-sided colon cancer. The four-month DCR was 41.7% (95% CI 15% to 72%) with median OS at 13.9 months and median PFS of 5.3 months, which did not meet the pre-specified endpoint of efficacy. The treatment combination was well tolerated with the most common treatment-related toxicity being decreased lymphocyte and neutrophil counts.
conclusionWhile clinical benefit was observed with the combination, it did not meet its pre-specified endpoint for efficacy in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF WT EGFR therapy-naïve mCRC patients. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03446157.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.