ReviewRestorative neurology and neuroscience2026
Advancing Stroke Recovery Through Operant Conditioning of Corticomuscular Coherence.
Review in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As stroke results in deficits spanning multiple functional domains, interventions that promote neuroplasticity-like mechanisms across brain and body systems may optimize recovery. In this perspective, we propose a rehabilitation strategy combining operant conditioning with corticomuscular coherence (CMC), a neurophysiological marker of communication between brain and muscle. CMC reflects the synchrony of descending cortical drive with spinal motor output, serving as a real-time index of volitional control. We assert that reinforcing CMC through operant conditioning can strengthen movement-related neural circuits while simultaneously engaging cognitive systems responsible for motor planning, attention, and error correction. Drawing from motor learning, systems neuroscience, and neuroengineering evidence, we outline the conceptual rationale along with the translational potential and implementation challenges of this CMC-based operant conditioning approach. We posit that this framework offers a biologically plausible strategy to strengthen residual motor capacity and restore functional integration across disrupted circuits connecting brain and body systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.