ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Adhesion evaluation of a new self-cured resin to sclerotic dentin.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Oral Rehabilitation in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: 18-Year-Old Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- In vitro evaluation of a novel self-adhesive composite primer modified with nano zinc oxide and hydroxyapatite: antibacterial activity, marginal microleakage, and interfacial elemental analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, a self-curing dental composite (Stela) was developed, promising several advantages and indications. One of them includes the restoration of Class V cavities. However, non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) frequently present sclerotic dentin as a substrate for adhesion. Thus, the objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of this material on bovine sclerotic dentin through a shear bond test (SBS), comparing it with a universal self-etching adhesive system with 10-MDP, which is considered to have the best adhesive performance in this situation (Single Bond Universal). In parallel, the effect of airborne-particle abrasion (APA) on the performance of the two adhesive systems was evaluated and whether it affected them differently. Four groups were tested: Stela (S), APA + Stela (APAS), Universal (U), and APA + Universal (APAU), each one with 12 specimens. In addition, the type of fracture and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of representative specimens of the groups were evaluated. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The results were evaluated using two-way ANOVA, with a significance level of 5%. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the performance of the two adhesives. Additionally, APA increased the adhesive strength of both adhesives, and there was no significant interaction between APA and the two adhesives tested. The results obtained by analyzing the fracture type and SEM also showed a similar pattern. Stela Primer showed SBS values to sclerotic dentin similar to Single Bond Universal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.