ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Tophus severity grading and surgical treatment: Chinese Medical Doctor Association Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement and Recommendations, 2025.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From uric acid to tophi: multistage molecular and cellular mechanisms of tophi formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTophi, a severe complication of advanced gout, developed in approximately 12-35% of patients with gout, with rates as high as 52.56% being reported. Bone and joint damage and chronic refractory wounds caused by gouty tophus present considerable clinical challenges. However, the optimal surgical timing, perioperative management, and treatment approaches for this condition remain unstandardized. Therefore, an expert consensus statement was developed to provide guidance for surgical intervention and improve clinical management of gouty tophus. MATERIALS AND
methodsA multidisciplinary expert committee representing relevant clinical specialties was established, and key questions on tophus surgery were compiled. Eleven scientific literature databases were queried to retrieve relevant papers, and a literature quality assessment was performed. Four meetings (nominal group technique) and two Delphi voting rounds were conducted to define tophus erosion grading criteria and establish recommendations. Consensus was considered to have been achieved when at least 85% of panelists indicated agreement. Perspectives from two patients with tophi were incorporated through interviews.
resultsGrading criteria (grades 1-4) for tophus erosion damage were established, and 14 recommendations for surgical treatment (eight strongly recommended and six conditional) were formulated - two on determining tophus erosion severity, four on perioperative management, and eight on surgical indications and treatment.
conclusionThis study presents the first consensus to introduce standardized criteria for grading tophus severity through multidisciplinary collaboration and offers evidence-based recommendations on optimal surgical timing, perioperative management, and treatment strategies to enhance patient outcomes and guide clinical practice. These recommendations may serve as a foundation for future research and standardization efforts in the surgical management of gouty tophus globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.