ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Identification and validation of an explainable machine learning model for hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The translational paradox of AI in hepatocellular carcinoma: from algorithmic over-engineering to real-world clinical utility.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based personalized treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: integrating HSP90α for prognosis and survival prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there is still a lack of noninvasive, automated, and accurate machine learning (ML) model for prognostic risk stratification of high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (hHCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). PURPOSE: To develop and test an ML-based model that integrates various clinical variables for prediction of early recurrence (ER, defined as recurrence within 24 months after treatment) after TACE for hHCC.
methodsFrom May 2008 to October 2022, consecutive patients with unresectable HCC who underwent initial TACE were reviewed at multicenter. We input 39 preoperative and 5 treatment-related variables into five ML-based models for ER prediction. Furthermore, we compared their performances using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong test between these ML models and the major staging systems including Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, China National Liver Cancer, American Joint Committee on Cancer, Japan Society of Hepatology, and Hong Kong Liver Cancer. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests.
resultsA total of 2068 eligible patients with hHCC were categorized into the training set ( n = 1220), the internal test set ( n = 306), and the external test set ( n = 542). ER rate was found in 78.4%, 78.8 %, and 62.5% of patients in three sets. Among all ML models, the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model using top seven variables yielded the highest AUC of 0.888 in the internal test set and 0.854 in the external test set. Furthermore, it yielded better discriminatory ability for RFS with higher time-dependent AUC than all major staging systems (DeLong test, all P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant OS and RFS risk stratification using the XGBoost model in three sets, respectively.
conclusionThe XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with other four ML models and all clinical staging systems in identifying ER, which may support individualized TACE management by guiding therapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.