Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990497›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Selective portal vein occlusion with hepatic artery preservation reduces posthepatectomy liver failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Jiming Ma, Shuo Jin, Jitao Wang, Liuqing Yang, Bingjun Tang, Canhong Xiang, Qiang Li, Pengfei Wang, Nan Jiang, Jianping Song and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jiming MaHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7095-8301
Shuo JinHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jitao WangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Liuqing YangDepartment of Information Administration, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Bingjun TangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Canhong XiangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qiang LiDepartment of Information Administration, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Pengfei WangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Nan JiangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jianping SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yumei LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Xiangyang, China.
Dongliang YangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yan WenHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xuedong WangHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jiahong DongHepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology, Ministry of Education, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent hepatic inflow occlusion techniques have limitations in effectively preventing posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Innovations in occlusion methods remain a critical area for advancement. This study investigated a hepatic inflow occlusion approach using selective portal vein occlusion (SPO) while maintaining hepatic arterial flow, aiming to evaluate its perioperative effects.

methodsClinical data from consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared after a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM) based on sex, age, body mass index, and Child-Pugh score using a fixed random seed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PHLF. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association between vascular occlusion strategies and the incidence of PHLF.

resultsA total of 574 patients (192 SPO and 382 Pringle) were included. After PSM, 384 patients (192 SPO and 192 Pringle) were compared. PHLF was observed in 26 patients (6.8%). Hepatectomy with SPO was associated with a lower incidence of PHLF (3.1% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.026). No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complication rates between the two occlusion groups (7.3% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.165). The optimal cut-off value of ICG-R15 for predicting PHLF was identified as 6.9% based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.735-0.922), a sensitivity of 88.5%, and a specificity of 66.5%. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, blood loss ( P = 0.019), ICG-R15 > 0.069 ( P < 0.001), and undergoing >hemihepatectomy ( P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for PHLF. SPO was found to be an independent protective factor ( P = 0.005). Subgroup analysis identified populations that benefit more from SPO, showing a significantly lower incidence of PHLF in patients aged <60 years (OR = 5.42, P = 0.019), males (OR = 5.06, P = 0.010), those with BMI ≥ 23 (OR = 3.81, P = 0.049), without cirrhosis (OR = 4.9, P = 0.003), with benign disease (OR = 5.07, P = 0.031), and undergoing ≤ hemihepatectomy (OR = 5.16, P = 0.005).

conclusionThe occlusion approach of SPO while preserving hepatic arterial flow can significantly reduce the incidence of PHLF.

Indexed as

HepatectomyHepatic ArteryLiver FailurePortal VeinPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReperfusion InjuryRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorshepatectomyhepatic inflow occlusionposthepatectomy liver failurepropensity score matchingretrospective studyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40990497
PMCPMC12825718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.