ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2025
Automatic Molecule Fragmentation for Density Matrix Embedding Theory.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Quantum Computations on a Protein.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In quantum chemical calculations, the computational cost of highly accurate ground-state energy calculations for large-scale molecules is exceedingly high. To reduce the computational cost while sustaining high accuracy, quantum embedding methods, such as the density matrix embedding theory (DMET) and bootstrap embedding (BE), have been developed. In DMET, we need to manually determine how to fragment a target molecule, and both the accuracy and computational cost strongly depend on it. This issue hinders the easy application of DMET to practical molecules. On the other hand, BE can be easily applied to any molecules because it automatically constructs fragments based on the structure of a target molecule. In this work, we propose a graph-based automatic molecule fragmentation (GAF) technique to enable the easy application of DMET and evaluate the accuracy and wall-clock time of DMET applying the proposed technique (GAF-DMET) and the atom-based BE (ABE) for a wide variety of molecules on a cluster system. GAF represents a molecular structure with an undirected graph where edge weights represent interatomic interactions and determines an accurate fragmentation pattern by solving a graph partitioning problem that minimizes the total weight of edges cut. For GAF, we present two metrics to accurately represent interatomic interactions in different basis sets and the automatic adjustment of the number of fragments. The evaluation for 14 small molecules shows that (1) GAF successfully selects accurate fragmentation patterns, and (2) GAF-DMET can achieve higher or comparable accuracy than ABE in shorter wall-clock times. Moreover, we demonstrate that GAF-DMET is more accurate than ABE in two use cases: binding energy calculations between middle and small molecules, and an S
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.