ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2026
Craniotomy in Semi-sitting Position: A 4-year Single Institution Experience.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to determine patient outcomes after craniotomies performed in semi-sitting position in our institution from 2019-2023. Primarily, we examined surgical and anaesthetic (clinical) outcomes. Secondarily, we evaluated any major complications that may have occurred. Methods: Hospital records from 2019-2023 were retrospectively reviewed for adult patients who underwent craniotomy in the sitting position. Individual charts were examined for intra- and postoperative events. The demographic and clinically important findings were tabulated using Excel spreadsheet. The dataset was descriptively analyzed, with quantitative data represented as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative data as valid percentages from the total cohort. Parametric comparisons of sex vs. (length of intensive care unit and hospital stay) and anaesthesia duration (in minutes) were performed using Student's t-test. A 95% confidence level was used to determine statistical significance. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Results: From 2019-2023, 10 patients underwent craniotomy in a sitting position. General anaesthesia was induced and maintained using an intravenous target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol. Nine patients developed pneumocephalus, with one developing increased intracranial pressure. One patient had a significant venous air embolism with severe manifestations, including massive pleural effusion. All patients except one were extubated at the end of the surgery. Conclusion: Of the 10 craniotomies performed in the sitting position from 2019-2023, 90% were managed without major long-term sequelae. Although the sitting position for craniotomies is not without challenges, a dedicated and experienced team can manage complications and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.