Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990360›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2026

Craniotomy in Semi-sitting Position: A 4-year Single Institution Experience.

Arunabha Karmakar, Muhammad Jaffar Khan, Ayten Saraçoğlu, Merve Ergenç, Mogahed Ismail Hassan Hussein, Mohammed Janish Orompurath, Kemal Tolga Saraçoğlu, Kishore Kumar Gangineni, Pawel Ratajczyk, Neeraj Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arunabha KarmakarHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0336-3782
Muhammad Jaffar KhanHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5082-5906
Ayten SaraçoğluHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-1186-0933
Merve ErgençUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6272-7174
Mogahed Ismail Hassan HusseinHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-8525
Mohammed Janish OrompurathHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Research Analyst and Bioinformatics, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-0622
Kemal Tolga SaraçoğluHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-9470-7418
Kishore Kumar GangineniHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0002-5763-1674
Pawel RatajczykMedical University of Lodz, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-2568
Neeraj KumarHamad Medical Corporation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and Perioperative Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-9426-4677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to determine patient outcomes after craniotomies performed in semi-sitting position in our institution from 2019-2023. Primarily, we examined surgical and anaesthetic (clinical) outcomes. Secondarily, we evaluated any major complications that may have occurred. Methods: Hospital records from 2019-2023 were retrospectively reviewed for adult patients who underwent craniotomy in the sitting position. Individual charts were examined for intra- and postoperative events. The demographic and clinically important findings were tabulated using Excel spreadsheet. The dataset was descriptively analyzed, with quantitative data represented as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative data as valid percentages from the total cohort. Parametric comparisons of sex vs. (length of intensive care unit and hospital stay) and anaesthesia duration (in minutes) were performed using Student's t-test. A 95% confidence level was used to determine statistical significance. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Results: From 2019-2023, 10 patients underwent craniotomy in a sitting position. General anaesthesia was induced and maintained using an intravenous target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol. Nine patients developed pneumocephalus, with one developing increased intracranial pressure. One patient had a significant venous air embolism with severe manifestations, including massive pleural effusion. All patients except one were extubated at the end of the surgery. Conclusion: Of the 10 craniotomies performed in the sitting position from 2019-2023, 90% were managed without major long-term sequelae. Although the sitting position for craniotomies is not without challenges, a dedicated and experienced team can manage complications and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Craniotomyneuroanaesthesiaperioperative carepneumocephalussitting positionvenous air embolism

Identifiers

PMID40990360
PMCPMC12884855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.