Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990267›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Artificial intelligence for HIV care: a global systematic review of current studies and emerging trends.

Sanele Ngcobo, Edith Madela Mntla, Jonathan Shock, Murray Louw, Linda Mbonambi, Thato Serite, Theresa Rossouw

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanele NgcoboDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-0181
Edith Madela MntlaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-2443
Jonathan ShockDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-0376
Murray LouwDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7181
Linda MbonambiLibrary, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-4909
Thato SeriteLibrary, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-3282
Theresa RossouwDepartment of Immunology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-922X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionArtificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools in HIV care, driving advancements in diagnostics, treatment monitoring and patient management. The present review aimed to systematically identify, map and synthesize studies on the use of AI methods across the HIV care continuum, including applications in HIV testing and linkage to care, treatment monitoring, retention in care, and management of clinical and immunological outcomes.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases, including PubMed and ProQuest Central, Scopus and Web of Science, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, screening 3185 records, of which 47 studies were included in the final analysis.

resultsForty-seven studies were grouped into four thematic areas: (1) HIV testing, AI models improved diagnostic accuracy, with ML achieving up to 100% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity in self-testing and outperforming human interpretation of rapid tests; (2) Retention in care and virological response, ML predicted clinic attendance, viral suppression and virological failure (72-97% accuracy; area under the curve up to 0.76), enabling early identification of high-risk patients; (3) Clinical and immunological outcomes, AI predicted disease progression, immune recovery, comorbidities and HIV complications, achieving up to 97% CD4 status accuracy and outperforming clinicians in tuberculosis diagnosis; (4) Testing and treatment support, AI chatbots improved self-testing uptake, linkage to care and adherence support. Methods included random forests, neural networks, support vector machines, deep learning and many others. DISCUSSION: AI has the potential to transform HIV care by improving early diagnosis, treatment adherence and retention in care. However, challenges such as data quality, infrastructure limitations and ethical considerations must be addressed to ensure successful implementation.

conclusionsAI has demonstrated immense potential to address gaps in HIV care, improving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing retention strategies and supporting effective treatment monitoring. These advancements contribute towards achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. However, challenges such as data quality and integration into healthcare systems remain. Future research should prioritize scalable AI solutions tailored to high-burden, resource-limited settings to maximize their impact on global HIV care. PROSPERO NUMBER: PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024517798 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024517798.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHIV InfectionsHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligencechatbotsdiagnosticsHIV caremachine learningretention to caretreatment monitoringviral suppression

Identifiers

PMID40990267
PMCPMC12458397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.