SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2025
Artificial intelligence for HIV care: a global systematic review of current studies and emerging trends.
Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of AI-Enabled Chatbots for Pre-consultation in HIV Care in Northern Nigeria.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Health Research in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Potential and Caution.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- AI for Prognosis Among People Living With HIV: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence research in journals indexed in the web of science "infectious diseases" category: a bibliometric analysis, 2016-2025.Infection · 2026Article
- Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Federated Learning Performance Depends on Site Variation in Global HIV Data Consortia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning risk stratification to identify people living with HIV at high risk of delayed ART and advanced immunosuppression: a precision public health approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in HIV research: a structured review and task-oriented clinical framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Digital twin technology for HIV patient virtual modeling: a novel approach to treatment optimization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- HIV-1 and Artificial Intelligence: From Molecular Insight to Population Impact.Journal of AIDS and HIV treatment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionArtificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools in HIV care, driving advancements in diagnostics, treatment monitoring and patient management. The present review aimed to systematically identify, map and synthesize studies on the use of AI methods across the HIV care continuum, including applications in HIV testing and linkage to care, treatment monitoring, retention in care, and management of clinical and immunological outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases, including PubMed and ProQuest Central, Scopus and Web of Science, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, screening 3185 records, of which 47 studies were included in the final analysis.
resultsForty-seven studies were grouped into four thematic areas: (1) HIV testing, AI models improved diagnostic accuracy, with ML achieving up to 100% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity in self-testing and outperforming human interpretation of rapid tests; (2) Retention in care and virological response, ML predicted clinic attendance, viral suppression and virological failure (72-97% accuracy; area under the curve up to 0.76), enabling early identification of high-risk patients; (3) Clinical and immunological outcomes, AI predicted disease progression, immune recovery, comorbidities and HIV complications, achieving up to 97% CD4 status accuracy and outperforming clinicians in tuberculosis diagnosis; (4) Testing and treatment support, AI chatbots improved self-testing uptake, linkage to care and adherence support. Methods included random forests, neural networks, support vector machines, deep learning and many others. DISCUSSION: AI has the potential to transform HIV care by improving early diagnosis, treatment adherence and retention in care. However, challenges such as data quality, infrastructure limitations and ethical considerations must be addressed to ensure successful implementation.
conclusionsAI has demonstrated immense potential to address gaps in HIV care, improving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing retention strategies and supporting effective treatment monitoring. These advancements contribute towards achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. However, challenges such as data quality and integration into healthcare systems remain. Future research should prioritize scalable AI solutions tailored to high-burden, resource-limited settings to maximize their impact on global HIV care. PROSPERO NUMBER: PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024517798 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024517798.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.