Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990203›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

The Moral Regime of Midwifery Continuity of Carer Implementation in England.

Aimee Louise Middlemiss, Susan Channon, Julia Sanders, Heather Strange, Rebecca Milton, Sara Kenyon, Tina Prendeville, Susan Barry, Aled Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aimee Louise MiddlemissSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-717X
Susan ChannonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Julia SandersSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Heather StrangeCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rebecca MiltonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sara KenyonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tina PrendevilleWomen's Health Research Centre, Imperial College London & Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
Susan BarryDivision of Women's Children's and Clinical Support, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Aled JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

Health and Social Care Delivery Research NIHR151802National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2016, the National Health Service (NHS) in England has been aiming to implement midwifery continuity of carer (MCoC), a model of maternity care in which the same midwife or small group of midwives provides antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care for women, other birthing people and their babies. However, the implementation has faced significant difficulties. As part of a wider investigation into barriers to and facilitators of MCoC implementation, we carried out qualitative interviews with senior stakeholders involved in the implementation of MCoC at regional or national level in England. In this paper, we present an analysis of sociocultural values in the accounts of these stakeholders. We find these expert accounts of MCoC implementation are underpinned by a 'moral regime' which privileges certain norms and practices whilst deterring others. These accounts produce an idealised midwife-subject who is passionate and evangelical about MCoC as a form of care and seeks to persuade others to their cause, including through the use of evidence. We conclude with some thoughts about the range of possible consequences produced by this moral regime regarding the implementation of MCoC as a maternity policy in the English NHS, and the role of moral regimes in healthcare politics.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyMoralsEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID40990203
PMCPMC12458978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.