ArticleMilitary medicine2026
Utility of Heart Rate Variability and Exertional Task Completion During Recovery of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Active Duty Service Members.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrimary care exertional testing is recommended for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) management in active duty service members (ADSM) before return-to-duty (RTD), yet there are no validated standardized tasks with objective physiological measures. Impairments to the automatic nervous system (ANS) after mTBI may last beyond symptom resolution and impact readiness for duty. Assessment of ANS functioning (heart rate variability, HRV) could provide an objective measure of mTBI recovery. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighteen ADSM with mTBI (2 weeks or less post-injury) and 18 age-matched healthy controls (HC) performed a protocol of two brief exertional tasks that challenge exertional and autonomic impairments: a 6-minute metronome-paced step-task and a 2-minute self-paced push-up task with built in rest periods. Heart rate variability components Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA; parasympathetic input) and heart period (HP; average inter-beat-intervals), symptoms levels, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured prior, during, and after each task. All study procedures were approved by The U.S. Army Regional Health Command-Atlantic (RHC-A) IRB, #2019-001.
resultsBetween group analyses of self-rated and HRV components demonstrated mTBI differences: higher RPE during recovery (B = 1.0, P < .01); increased symptoms under exertion (χ2(1,36) = 5.14, P < .03); lower RSA at Rest 1 (B = -1.0, P = .04) indicating longer recovery; higher RSA during push-ups (B = 1.22, P = .02; and higher Heart Period during both step (B = 75.34, P < .02) and push-up task (B = 84.43, P < .01)) indicating less vagal withdrawal compared to HCs. ADSM with mTBI were less likely to successfully complete both tasks (OR = 5.80, [1.79-18.82]).
conclusionsThese brief exertional tasks may prove useful in primary care to identify symptomatic responses to exercise. Heart rate variability measurement may expose autonomic dysfunction that could influence readiness for full return to duty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.