ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Psychological Dimensions of Hair Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Complications in follicular unit excision hair transplantation: current evidence and practical approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Psychological Dimensions of Hair Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHair transplantation is a widely performed intervention for alopecia, offering both cosmetic restoration and psychological benefits. Increasing evidence highlights the psychosocial impact of hair loss, particularly regarding self-esteem, identity, and social functioning.
aimsThis review aims to evaluate the psychological dimensions of hair transplantation, including patient motivations, emotional burden, the role of psychological screening, and the associated mental health outcomes.
methodsA structured narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases to identify peer-reviewed articles published up to May 31, 2025. Search terms included "hair transplantation," "alopecia," "psychological impact," "body dysmorphic disorder," "depression," and "quality of life." Studies focusing on adult patients undergoing hair transplantation and reporting psychological outcomes or screening practices were included.
resultsHair loss is associated with significant psychological distress and may exacerbate depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal. Screening tools such as the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) are effective in identifying high-risk individuals. When patient expectations are well managed and psychological risk factors are considered, hair transplantation can lead to improved self-esteem, confidence, and emotional well-being. Conversely, inadequate screening or poor patient selection may result in dissatisfaction or worsening mental health.
conclusionsIncorporating psychological evaluation into preoperative assessment must be considered for optimizing surgical and mental health outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach involving dermatologists, surgeons, and mental health professionals is recommended. Further research should establish standardized guidelines for psychosocial screening in hair restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.