Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Tumor

Takashi Shimizu, Ryotaro Ohkuma, Mayumi Homma, Shingo Nakayama, Yosuke Sasaki, Satoshi Muto, Katsuaki Ieguchi, Makoto Watanabe, Akashi Taguchi, Daisuke Takayanagi and 15 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Takashi ShimizuDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryotaro OhkumaDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayumi HommaDepartment of Pathology, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo NakayamaDepartment of Pathology, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke SasakiDepartment of Pathology, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi MutoDepartment of Chest Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Katsuaki IeguchiDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto WatanabeDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akashi TaguchiIsotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke TakayanagiDepartment of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Youichiro WadaIsotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi HoriikeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaro KubotaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotsugu AriizumiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro ShimokawaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuya HirasawaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyuki IshiguroDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Risako SuzukiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Nana IriguchiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Emiko MuraDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi YoshimuraClinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayumi TsujiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji KiuchiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuzukiDepartment of Chest Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Toshiko YamochiDepartment of Pathology, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A prior retrospective analysis demonstrated that quantifying Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using a phosphor-integrated dot (PID) score effectively predicted immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other cancers. However, PD-L1 expression proved unreliable in some patients with low PD-L1 levels, highlighting the need for alternative biomarkers. A previous cohort study in NSCLC patients linked intestinal Methods: We retrospectively analyzed tumor tissues from 60 metastatic or recurrent NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to assess Akk and PD-L1 expression, along with CD3 and CD68 in PD-L1-low samples. Transcriptomic profiling using RNA-sequencing was conducted on tumor samples to identify Akk-related gene expression patterns. Results: Tumor Akk expression showed no correlation with PD-L1 levels assessed via PID. Survival and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed no association between Akk expression and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). In high PD-L1 patients, Akk status did not influence outcomes. However, among low PD-L1 patients, Akk-positive cases exhibited significantly worse PFS compared to Akk-negative cases (OS remained unchanged). Transcriptome analysis indicated that Akk positivity in low PD-L1 samples exhibited enrichment in oxidative phosphorylation and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-related pathways and downregulation of spliceosome-associated pathways. No significant differences in tumor-infiltrating CD3+ T cells or CD68+ macrophages were observed between Akk-positive and Akk-negative tumors in the PD-L1-low group. Conclusions: Tumor-associated Akk may serve as a negative predictive biomarker for ICI efficacy in NSCLC patients with low PD-L1 expression. Our findings suggest that tumor microbiota profiling, particularly targeting Akk, could refine patient stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Indexed as

AkkermansiaB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsbiomarkerimmunecheckpoint inhibitorsimmunohistochemistryPD-L1tumor Akkermansia muciniphila

Identifiers

PMID40990022
PMCPMC12450707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.