ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Tumor
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research landscape, thematic evolution, and translational insights of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: a bibliometric analysis (2006-2025).Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Decoding Akkermansia muciniphila Effector Biology: From Microbial Molecules to Host Outcomes.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Microbial Influence on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: The Gut-Lung-Immune Axis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A prior retrospective analysis demonstrated that quantifying Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using a phosphor-integrated dot (PID) score effectively predicted immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other cancers. However, PD-L1 expression proved unreliable in some patients with low PD-L1 levels, highlighting the need for alternative biomarkers. A previous cohort study in NSCLC patients linked intestinal Methods: We retrospectively analyzed tumor tissues from 60 metastatic or recurrent NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to assess Akk and PD-L1 expression, along with CD3 and CD68 in PD-L1-low samples. Transcriptomic profiling using RNA-sequencing was conducted on tumor samples to identify Akk-related gene expression patterns. Results: Tumor Akk expression showed no correlation with PD-L1 levels assessed via PID. Survival and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed no association between Akk expression and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). In high PD-L1 patients, Akk status did not influence outcomes. However, among low PD-L1 patients, Akk-positive cases exhibited significantly worse PFS compared to Akk-negative cases (OS remained unchanged). Transcriptome analysis indicated that Akk positivity in low PD-L1 samples exhibited enrichment in oxidative phosphorylation and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-related pathways and downregulation of spliceosome-associated pathways. No significant differences in tumor-infiltrating CD3+ T cells or CD68+ macrophages were observed between Akk-positive and Akk-negative tumors in the PD-L1-low group. Conclusions: Tumor-associated Akk may serve as a negative predictive biomarker for ICI efficacy in NSCLC patients with low PD-L1 expression. Our findings suggest that tumor microbiota profiling, particularly targeting Akk, could refine patient stratification and therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.