Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990005›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2025

Cross-sectional survey on independent mobility of people with dementia: a caregivers' perspective.

Ise Anderson Orobor, Ramy Hammady, Mary Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ise Anderson OroborUniversity of Essex, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Colchester Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9983-7141
Ramy HammadyUniversity of Southampton, Winchester School of Art, Winchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-6039
Mary KennedyUniversity of Essex, School of Health and Social Care, Colchester Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-0413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia significantly impairs cognitive function and severely affects daily living activities. To support independent mobility in older adults and individuals with dementia, home modification strategies, such as safety adaptations, have been identified as critical interventions. Objective: To explore caregivers' perspectives on the potentials of digital interventions in enhancing independent mobility for PwD in mild to moderate stages of the condition. The aim is to determine if digital intervention could help PwD to effectively use existing home safety interventions and to safely move around their environment. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to gather insights from 121 professional caregivers and family members providing care for PwD. Participants aged 18 years and above were eligible for inclusion. Responses were analysed using R software, employing descriptive statistics, contingency tables, and graphical charts. χ Results: The study revealed that PwD made limited use of existing home safety interventions, with statistically significant findings (p<0.05) across the four mobility factors evaluated. This indicates that the effectiveness of these interventions could be undermined particularly for individuals living alone. Conclusion: The study found that digital interventions can support PwD in using existing home safety interventions and navigating their environments more independently. It could help the target population know when and how to these interventions thereby increasing the overall goal of their implementations.

Indexed as

AdultCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionDementiaHome EnvironmentSafety

Identifiers

PMID40990005
PMCPMC12452096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.