ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Composite resin strip crowns (CRSC) are a popular choice for the restoration of primary incisors affected by early childhood caries (ECC). The inherent disadvantage of composite resins necessitates a search for more biological materials to be used for restorations in this high-caries-risk scenario. Aims and objective: This Materials and methods: A total of 32 teeth from 16 children aged 3-6 years with ECC requiring multisurface restorations in their primary maxillary incisors were included and randomly assigned to the test group (GC Equia Forte) or the control group (GC G-aenial composite resin). Clinical assessment was done using Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria, and parental satisfaction was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale over 3 months. The Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney Results: GC Equia Forte outperformed GC G-aenial composite resin in terms of esthetic parameters, that is, color match and translucency ( Conclusion: The results suggest that GC Equia Forte HT is a suitable and viable alternative to composite resin for strip crown restorations in pediatric patients with ECC. Clinical significance: GC Equia Forte HT proves to be esthetically superior and functionally and biologically comparable to composite resin for strip crown restoration of carious primary incisors in precooperative-aged children with ECC. How to cite this article: Malik N, Nayak R, Acharya S. Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):922-929.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.