ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Assessment of Undergraduate Training in Pulpectomy Using Model Teeth and Extracted Natural Teeth.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Pulpectomy is a procedure that is done by removing the entire coronal and radicular pulp of primary teeth. To achieve an optimal outcome in dental treatment, a combination of scientific knowledge and technical skills is required. Sufficient simulated practice is needed for dental students before performing treatment on patients as they get better hand-eye-foot coordination. The main aim of the study is to assess undergraduate training in pulpectomy using the typodont model and extracted natural teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 100 final-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students, with 50 practicing pulpectomy on typodont teeth and 50 on extracted natural teeth. All students then performed pulpectomy on pediatric teeth. Clinical performance was assessed based on access cavity preparation, biomechanical preparation (BMP), obturation, and procedural efficiency. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to compare the effectiveness of training on model vs natural teeth. Results: Regarding obturation, students trained with extracted teeth showed better results, with an optimal obturation (91 vs 96%). Group II (extracted natural teeth) outperformed group I (artificial teeth) in BMP. Canal cleaning adequacy was higher (91 vs 87%), and shaping accuracy improved (93 vs 87%), likely due to the realistic anatomical challenges of natural teeth. Errors in over- or underpreparation were also fewer in group II (6 vs 18%), indicating enhanced judgment in canal preparation. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study demonstrated that training with extracted natural teeth resulted in superior performance in key pulpectomy procedures, such as access cavity preparation, BMP, and obturation, compared to training with model teeth. Clinical significance: This study evaluates the effectiveness of model and natural teeth training in enhancing student competency for pediatric pulpectomy, aiding improvements in dental education and clinical outcomes. How to cite this article: Venkatraj R, Gurunathan D. Assessment of Undergraduate Training in Pulpectomy Using Model Teeth and Extracted Natural Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):977-981.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.