ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Management of Jaw Fractures in Pediatric Patients Using Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Series.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Mandibular fractures are common in pediatric patients due to active lifestyles, with the mandible being the most frequently fractured facial bone. In children, fractures are often greenstick, requiring careful management to avoid disrupting growth and dentition. Conventional treatments, such as intermaxillary fixation (IMF) using arch bars, can be challenging in mixed dentition. This case series explores the use of orthodontic appliances as an alternative approach for managing pediatric mandibular fractures. Case description: Three pediatric patients with mandibular fractures were treated using orthodontic appliances for IMF-case 1: a 9-year-old male with a left mandibular angle fracture was treated with stainless steel brackets and elastics for 2 weeks. Follow-up showed full recovery with no pain or occlusal issues. Case 2: a 6-year-old male with bilateral condylar and symphyseal fractures was treated with brackets on all teeth up to the deciduous second molars. After 2 weeks, improved occlusion and mouth opening were noted. Case 3: a 6-year-old female with a right condylar fracture showed improved occlusion and symptom resolution after 2 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: Orthodontic appliances provide a noninvasive alternative for IMF in pediatric mandibular fractures. They offer stable fixation, preserve developing dentition, and reduce the need for invasive procedures, ensuring proper healing. Clinical significance: Orthodontic appliances are a viable treatment option for pediatric mandibular fractures, especially in mixed dentition. This approach enhances patient comfort, improves oral hygiene, and avoids complications associated with traditional fixation methods, making it an effective tool in pediatric trauma care. How to cite this article: Ratre RK, Newaskar V, Kanesh A,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.