ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Acoustic Analyses of the Digital Doppler Allen Test.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to perform noninvasive acoustic quantification of digital arterial Doppler sounds and to determine the possibility of evaluating digital arterial circulation using the results of acoustic assessment. Methods: In this prospective study, we recorded the Doppler sounds of the radial and ulnar digital arteries of all digits of 25 volunteers (male, n = 10; female, n = 15) included in the study, converted these recordings into digital files, and analyzed them using a fast Fourier transform analyzer. We recorded the Doppler sound of each digital artery by means of (1) contralateral digital artery compression, (2) ipsilateral digital artery compression, and (3) no compression as a control. The analyzed parameters comprised the equivalent sound level (Leq), sound pressure difference between the maximum and minimum sound pressures (delta sound pressure), and frequency. In addition, the Doppler sounds of the contralateral and compression groups were acoustically compared with those of the control group by 2 examiners. Results: The contralateral compression group demonstrated a statistically lower Leq and greater delta sound pressure. In particular, the delta sound pressure had a higher sensitivity and specificity. The ipsilateral compression group had a significantly lower Leq and frequency. The Doppler sounds of the contralateral compression group resembled a staccato rhythm. The agreement rate of the kappa coefficients was high. Conclusions: The patency of the digital artery is presumably high if the Doppler sound changes to a staccato rhythm upon compression of the contralateral digital artery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.