ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Limited clinical benefit of medial meniscus posterior root repair combined with high tibial osteotomy in varus knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pullout repair combined with double-plate fixation via inverted V-shaped high tibial osteotomy for medial meniscus posterior root tears with severe varus tibial deformity.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based meniscal coverage and cartilage thickness are associated with mechanical axis alignment in knee osteoarthritis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Not all meniscal repair failures are equal: A comparison between early and late failure risk factors.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Concomitant arthroscopy during valgus-producing high tibial osteotomy does not demonstrate consistent additional clinical benefit despite improved cartilage findings: A systematic review of comparative studies.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Limited clinical benefit of medial meniscus posterior root repair combined with high tibial osteotomy in varus knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are biomechanically comparable to total meniscectomy, leading to meniscal extrusion, increased tibiofemoral contact pressure and accelerated osteoarthritis (OA) in varus-aligned knees. While high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is effective in unloading the medial compartment, the added value of repairing the MMPRT during HTO remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether combined MMPRT repair and HTO provide superior short-term clinical and radiological outcomes compared to HTO alone. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus was performed in March 2025. Comparative studies evaluating HTO with or without concurrent MMPR repair in patients with varus knee and medial OA were included. Primary outcomes were clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, Knee Society Score [KSS] and Hospital for Special Surgery [HSS]), radiographic parameters (joint line convergence angle [JLCA], hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle and joint space width), meniscal extrusion and second-look arthroscopic findings. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with Review Manager 5.4. Results: Eight retrospective comparative studies ( Conclusion: Short-term follow-up shows that combining MMPRT repair with HTO yields statistically better IKDC clinical scores. Furthermore, the actual benefit of combining MMPRT repair with HTO in routine clinical practice is questionable. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are required to clarify the long-term clinical impact of MM. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.