ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Diagnostic and prognostic potential of biomarkers in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic potential of biomarkers in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Early diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is essential. This systematic review aimed to identify biomarkers useful for diagnosing FAIS and predicting its progression to hip osteoarthritis. Our hypothesis was that there are biomarkers that are useful for the diagnosis and/or prognosis of FAIS. Our research questions were: (1) which biomarkers support diagnosis or screening of FAIS? and (2) which biomarkers predict disease progression? Methods: A systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to investigate the relationship between biomarkers and FAIS. The diagnosis of FAIS was based on the criteria used in each original study, typically involving clinical symptoms and radiographic evidence of CAM or pincer morphology. The protocol for the review has been published in PROSPERO. Literature search was performed using three databases: Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. The initial search yielded 683 articles of which 16 articles were included for final analysis. Data from a total of 2134 participants were analysed. Sixty-eight unique biomarkers associated with FAIS were identified and measured. Results: Diagnostically, 19 biomarkers were identified, of which 12 could significantly detect a difference between patients with FAIS and healthy controls. Forty-two biomarkers predicting the association of FAIS with hip osteoarthritis or late FAIS were identified, of which 16 biomarkers were statistically significant. Only 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase promoter (ABAT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) were associated with both diagnosis and prognosis. Conclusions: Biomarkers may support the diagnosis and monitoring disease progression in patients with FAIS. Twelve biomarkers may detect early changes, and 16 may predict progression to osteoarthritis. Further refinement is required to identify those most useful in clinical practice. ABAT and PPARγ may be linked to both diagnosis and progression. While primarily preclinical, these findings may improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce overtreatment and aid decisions regarding joint preservation strategies. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.