Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989868›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Gloving the Surgeon:

Jay J Patel, Keenan S Fine, Aidan W O'Shea, Peter J Wirth, Ellen C Shaffrey, Pradeep K Attaluri, Venkat K Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay J PatelFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Keenan S FineFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Aidan W O'SheaFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Peter J WirthFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Ellen C ShaffreyFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Pradeep K AttaluriFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Venkat K RaoFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical gloves are a staple in every surgeon's daily routine, yet their full lifecycle is not always well understood. This paper outlines the journey of a surgical glove from manufacturing to disposal, with particular emphasis on clinically relevant properties such as durability, perforation rates, and allergy risk. It begins with a review of the historical context of sterile surgical gloves, followed by a detailed overview of the manufacturing process and the materials used, including latex and various synthetic alternatives. These various materials may differ in barrier protection, fit, tactile sensitivity, and allergenic potential. Data presented here suggests that synthetic alternatives to latex, while hypoallergenic, may be more prone to microperforations or decreased dexterity. The logistics of glove sourcing and inventory management are also examined, providing insights to help surgical teams and hospital administrators prepare for supply chain disruptions, such as those experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, best practices for glove disposal and the environmental impact of surgical gloves are explored. By examining the clinical and logistical aspects of glove use, this article offers insights to optimize surgical safety, resource management, and sustainability.

Identifiers

PMID40989868
PMCPMC12453325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.