ReviewAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025
Gloving the Surgeon:
Review in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Intriguing History of Gloves and Their Application to Surgery.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical gloves are a staple in every surgeon's daily routine, yet their full lifecycle is not always well understood. This paper outlines the journey of a surgical glove from manufacturing to disposal, with particular emphasis on clinically relevant properties such as durability, perforation rates, and allergy risk. It begins with a review of the historical context of sterile surgical gloves, followed by a detailed overview of the manufacturing process and the materials used, including latex and various synthetic alternatives. These various materials may differ in barrier protection, fit, tactile sensitivity, and allergenic potential. Data presented here suggests that synthetic alternatives to latex, while hypoallergenic, may be more prone to microperforations or decreased dexterity. The logistics of glove sourcing and inventory management are also examined, providing insights to help surgical teams and hospital administrators prepare for supply chain disruptions, such as those experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, best practices for glove disposal and the environmental impact of surgical gloves are explored. By examining the clinical and logistical aspects of glove use, this article offers insights to optimize surgical safety, resource management, and sustainability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.