ArticleBayesian analysis2025
Exploiting Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis: A Calibrated Bayesian Composite Likelihood Inference.
Article in Bayesian analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative gastrointestinal adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-target analogs in type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Exploiting Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis: A Calibrated Bayesian Composite Likelihood Inference.Bayesian analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which can lead to biased estimates and misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminates the need for a fully specified likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yields unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal levels. We implemented the proposed method to two real-world network meta-analysis datasets: one comparing treatment procedures for root coverage and the other comparing treatments for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.