Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989826›Full record

ArticleBayesian analysis2025

Exploiting Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis: A Calibrated Bayesian Composite Likelihood Inference.

Yifei Wang, Lifeng Lin, Yu-Lun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bayesian analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifei WangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Southern Methodist University.
Lifeng LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona.
Yu-Lun LiuPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Funding

Novel evidence-accumulation-driven methods for characterizing kidney stone progressionR01DK128237 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, YU-LUN · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which can lead to biased estimates and misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminates the need for a fully specified likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yields unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal levels. We implemented the proposed method to two real-world network meta-analysis datasets: one comparing treatment procedures for root coverage and the other comparing treatments for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Indexed as

Bayesian composite likelihoodGibbs samplingmultivariate network meta-analysisOpen-Faced Sandwich adjustmentunknown within-study correlations

Identifiers

PMID40989826
PMCPMC12453069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.