Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989812›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Mapping brain function underlying naturalistic motor observation and imitation using high-density diffuse optical tomography.

Dalin Yang, Tessa G George, Chloe M Sobolewski, Sophia R McMorrow, Carolina Pacheco, Kelsey T King, Rebecca Rochowiak, Evan Daniels-Day, Sung Min Park, Emma Speh and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Dalin YangMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Tessa G GeorgeMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Chloe M SobolewskiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sophia R McMorrowMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Carolina PachecoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kelsey T KingMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rebecca RochowiakCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Evan Daniels-DayMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sung Min ParkMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Emma SpehMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ari SegelMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Deana CrocettiCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alice D SperryCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8302-6990
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Bahar TunçgençDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rene VidalDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Natasha MarrusDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Stewart H MostofskyCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Adam T EggebrechtMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2676

Funding

Illuminating brain function during imitation in children with ASD with DOTR21MH127501 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EGGEBRECHT, ADAM THOMAS · 2022 to 2023
$453k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH127501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a condition defined by deficits in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors, is associated with early impairments in motor imitation that persist through childhood and into adulthood. Alterations in the mirror neuron system (MNS), crucial for interpreting and imitating actions, may underlie these ASD-associated differences in motor imitation. High-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT) overcomes logistical challenges of functional magnetic resonance imaging to enable identification of neural substrates of naturalistic motor imitation. We aim to investigate brain function underlying motor observation and imitation in autistic and non-autistic adults. We hypothesize that HD-DOT will reveal greater activation in regions associated with the MNS during motor imitation than during motor observation, and that MNS activity will negatively correlate with autistic traits and motor fidelity. We imaged brain function using HD-DOT in N = 100 participants (19 ASD and 81 non-autistic individuals) as they engaged in observing or imitating a sequence of arm movements. Additionally, during imitation, participant movements were simultaneously recorded with 3D cameras for computerized assessment of motor imitation (CAMI). Cortical responses were estimated using general linear models, and multiple regression was used to test for associations with autistic traits, assessed via the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2), and imitation fidelity, assessed via CAMI. Both observing and imitating motor movements elicited significant activations in higher-order visual and MNS regions, including the inferior parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, and inferior frontal gyrus. Imitation additionally exhibited greater activation in the superior parietal lobule, primary motor cortex, and supplementary motor area. Notably, the right temporal-parietal junction exhibited activation during observation but not during imitation. Higher presence of autistic traits was associated with increased activation during motor observation in the right superior parietal lobule. No significant associations between brain activation and CAMI scores were observed. Our findings provide robust evidence of shared and task-specific cortical responses underlying motor observation and imitation, emphasizing the differential engagement of MNS regions during motor observation and imitation.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorder (ASD)computer-vision-based assessment of motor imitation (CAMI)high-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT)motor imitation (IM)motor observation (OBS)non-autistic individuals (NAI)

Identifiers

PMID40989812
PMCPMC12451301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.