ArticleERJ open research2025
Detection of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using random forest models and automated measures of central computed tomography structures.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning-Enhanced Methods for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The clinical relevance of chest computed tomography imaging in pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- Navigating the Complexity of PH-ILD: From Molecular Mechanisms to Integrated Clinical Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Since pulmonary hypertension (PH) worsens the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), early prediction of PH is crucial for timely intervention. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict PH using automated computed tomography (CT)-based 3D measurements, particularly central cardiovascular structures, segmented by a publicly available tool. Methods: We retrospectively studied 163 IPF patients who underwent both thin-section chest CT (contrast-enhanced and non-contrast) and right heart catheterisation within 2 years (78.5% within 6 months). Central CT structures were segmented using the TotalSegmentator Neural Network Version 1. We also manually measured pulmonary artery (PA) and ascending aorta (A) diameters. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) models were created and the model's reliability was assessed with 10-fold cross-validation. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis was performed to understand the contribution of each variable to the RF model. Results: Of the 163 patients, 75 had PH (46.0%). Significant differences were found in race, body mass index, right atrial (RA) volume, and PA volume between PH and non-PH patients. The RF model outperformed the LR model, showing higher area under the curve (AUC) (0.87 Conclusion: The RF model with volumetric measures showed superior predictive performance for PH. Notably, both the RF model and segmentations of central CT structures are automated, facilitating seamless integration into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.