ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
The Efficacy of 2-Week Holter Monitoring for Detecting Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Recurrence After Initial Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Holter monitoring is widely used to detect atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, patients experience few subjective symptoms after CA, leading to potential underdiagnosis of recurrence. Two-week Holter monitoring may be more effective compared to 24-h Holter monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 2-week Holter monitoring for the detection of AT recurrence. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, 755 consecutive patients with AF (paroxysmal: 449, persistent: 256, long-standing: 50) who underwent initial CA with wide-area pulmonary vein isolation at our center were enrolled. Two-week Holter monitoring was conducted at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after CA. Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring was substituted for the first 24 h of the 2-week Holter monitoring. Freedom from AT recurrence was defined as the absence of AT lasting > 30 s beyond a 3-month blanking period. Results: Sixty-nine (9.1%) patients dropped out. Among the remaining 686 patients, AT recurrence was detected over the 2-year follow-up period in 173 cases (25.2%) using 2-week Holter monitoring and in 46 cases (6.7%) using 24-h Holter monitoring ( Conclusion: Two-week Holter monitoring was significantly more effective than conventional 24-h Holter monitoring for detecting AT recurrence after CA, particularly in patients with persistent and long-standing AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.