Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989761›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2025

Towards MRI-Only Mandibular Resection Planning: CT-like Bone Segmentation from Routine T1 MRI Images Using Deep Learning.

Reinier S A Ten Brink, Bram J Merema, Marith E den Otter, Willemina A van Veldhuizen, Max J H Witjes, Joep Kraeima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reinier S A Ten BrinkDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; b.j.merema@umcg.nl (B.J.M.); m.j.h.witjes@umcg.nl (M.J.H.W.); j.kraeima@umcg.nl (J.K.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3426-4710
Bram J MeremaDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; b.j.merema@umcg.nl (B.J.M.); m.j.h.witjes@umcg.nl (M.J.H.W.); j.kraeima@umcg.nl (J.K.).
Marith E den Otter3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlandsw.a.van.veldhuizen@umcg.nl (W.A.v.V.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9811-127X
Willemina A van Veldhuizen3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlandsw.a.van.veldhuizen@umcg.nl (W.A.v.V.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-9005
Max J H WitjesDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; b.j.merema@umcg.nl (B.J.M.); m.j.h.witjes@umcg.nl (M.J.H.W.); j.kraeima@umcg.nl (J.K.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-3246
Joep KraeimaDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; b.j.merema@umcg.nl (B.J.M.); m.j.h.witjes@umcg.nl (M.J.H.W.); j.kraeima@umcg.nl (J.K.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8527-960X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a deep learning-based approach for accurate bone segmentation directly from routine T1-weighted MRI scans, with the goal of enabling MRI-only virtual surgical planning in head and neck oncology. Current workflows rely on CT for bone modeling and MRI for tumor delineation, introducing challenges related to image registration, radiation exposure, and resource use. To address this, we trained a deep neural network using CT-based segmentations of the mandible, cranium, and inferior alveolar nerve as ground truth. A dataset of 100 patients with paired CT and MRI scans was collected. MRI scans were resampled to the voxel size of CT, and corresponding CT segmentations were rigidly aligned to MRI. The model was trained on 80 cases and evaluated on 20 cases using Dice similarity coefficient, Intersection over Union (IoU), precision, and recall. The network achieved a mean Dice of 0.86 (SD ± 0.03), IoU of 0.76 (SD ± 0.05), and both precision and recall of 0.86 (SD ± 0.05). Surface deviation analysis between CT- and MRI-derived bone models showed a median deviation of 0.21 mm (IQR 0.05) for the mandible and 0.30 mm (IQR 0.05) for the cranium. These results demonstrate that accurate CT-like bone models can be derived from standard MRI, supporting the feasibility of MRI-only surgical planning.

Indexed as

computer-assisteddeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingoralsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40989761
PMCPMC12452616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.