ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Blood memory CD8 T cell phenotypes in lung cancer patients predict immune checkpoint treatment responses.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Roles of V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation-mediated immunoregulation in tumor immune escape (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has become a standard treatment to re-invigorate tumor-attacking T cell responses in multiple cancer indications, yet a patient's response is unpredictable even with a confirmed expression of the relevant targets such as PD-1 or PD-L1. Previously identified biomarkers of response have relatively low accuracy, making it difficult to reliably employ them as predictors of clinical response. Methods: We comprehensively phenotyped peripheral blood CD8+ T cells from patients with non-small cell lung cancer by analyzing surface marker expression, transcriptome, and TCR repertoire with single-cell sequencing technology. The cohorts were comprised of patients who (a) responded to anti-PD(L)1 treatment for a prolonged period of time (b) were new-on-treatment responders, and (c) were new-on-treatment nonresponders. Using various bioinformatics analyses, we defined the signatures of ICI response and evaluated their performance on external scRNA-seq datasets. Results: We identified response-specific signals in cell type and cell state proportions as well as in TCR repertoire diversity and TCR inter-donor similarity. The enrichment analysis revealed several pathways and regulatory modules enriched in different response groups. Using machine learning, we identified cell-type-specific signatures that predicted the ICI response with an accuracy between 66% and 93% at the single cell level and up to 94% at the patient level. Effector memory CD8+ T cells in long-term responders were most predictive of response, and the inferred effector memory signature could be successfully applied to two related scRNA-seq datasets. CD44, GIMAP4, CD69, and CCL4L2 were among the most relevant contributing markers defining the predictive ML signatures on lung cancer samples. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CD8+ T cell subset-specific models reach an accuracy that possesses the potential to inform treatment decisions in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.