ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Supporting the global reduction of cervical cancer: challenges in colposcopy practice and training.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Comparative Review of Guidelines for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colposcopy is an important element in the global challenge of reducing cervical cancer incidence. However, there are issues with expanding its use globally, including resources, training of colposcopists and quality assurance. This narrative review explores the role of colposcopists and the challenges of ensuring that practice and training are fit for purpose. The review found that colposcopy and colposcopists play three roles in managing cervical cancer: in diagnosis and interventions; communicating with patients; and supporting public education. It also found that colposcopy practices are evolving globally, alongside regional and national variations in vaccination, screening and treatment practices, creating important challenges. Many countries have introduced quality indicators or standards, but studies show significant variations from these in practice. Training of colposcopists also varies across regions. Some developed countries have defined curricula, but developing countries are more reliant on distance learning courses provided by international bodies. The review identified several ways to address these challenges, including setting standards for either practice or training, and training healthcare professionals from different backgrounds as colposcopists. New technologies such as artificial intelligence could also help. The review also identified some gaps in the literature, offering potential for further research. These include developing a consensus on the training needs in particular areas, and exploring how global or regional standards are applied at local levels, and how training for soft skills can best be delivered to colposcopists. It is considered essential that educational curricula should be tailored to the specific circumstances of each country or region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.