Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989677›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025

Virtual reality perimetry facilitates visual field evaluation in a previously non-assessable eye with severe glaucoma.

Grant T Slagle, Sylvia L Groth, Sean P Donahue, William E Sponsel

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grant T SlagleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Willis Knighton Eye Institute, 2611 Greenwood Rd, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Sylvia L GrothDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2311 Pierce Ave, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sean P DonahueDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2311 Pierce Ave, Nashville, TN, USA.
William E SponselDepartment of Vision Sciences, University of the Incarnate Word, 4301 Broadway, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Virtual reality perimetry (VRP) is rapidly growing in popularity. Advantages of these devices have been noted in the literature: they require less capital investment than table-mounted perimeters, have a smaller footprint, and improve patient comfort. Unlike traditional perimeters, virtual reality perimeters can assess both eyes simultaneously, which it does by default on most of its testing algorithms. This novel function leads to an advantage of VRP over traditional perimetry that has not yet been reported: the ability to assess the visual field of an eye with poor fixation. We report a patient with advanced glaucoma who could not perform reliable standard perimetry due to a central scotoma in one eye but could perform VRP testing of each eye simultaneously. Observations: A 23-year-old male with advanced congenital glaucoma in the left eye presented for follow-up perimetry testing. In prior visits, his right eye consistently demonstrated a normal visual field, but left eye showed a progressively worsening global defect with poor reliability indices. At the present visit the patient performed VRP, which tested both eyes simultaneously. Good fixation with the right eye facilitated a reliable visual field of the left eye. Conclusions and importance: The virtual reality perimeters tests both eyes simultaneously, which traditional perimeters cannot do. In this case, fellow eye fixation facilitated the acquisition of a clinically meaningful visual field from a poorly fixing eye due to advanced glaucoma.

Indexed as

Central scotomaFellow eye fixationGlaucomaNon-fixating eyePerimetryVirtual reality perimetry

Identifiers

PMID40989677
PMCPMC12451285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.