ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Virtual reality perimetry facilitates visual field evaluation in a previously non-assessable eye with severe glaucoma.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blind Spot Displacement in Binocular Virtual Reality Perimetry: Incidence and Potential Determinants in Healthy Participants.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Virtual reality perimetry (VRP) is rapidly growing in popularity. Advantages of these devices have been noted in the literature: they require less capital investment than table-mounted perimeters, have a smaller footprint, and improve patient comfort. Unlike traditional perimeters, virtual reality perimeters can assess both eyes simultaneously, which it does by default on most of its testing algorithms. This novel function leads to an advantage of VRP over traditional perimetry that has not yet been reported: the ability to assess the visual field of an eye with poor fixation. We report a patient with advanced glaucoma who could not perform reliable standard perimetry due to a central scotoma in one eye but could perform VRP testing of each eye simultaneously. Observations: A 23-year-old male with advanced congenital glaucoma in the left eye presented for follow-up perimetry testing. In prior visits, his right eye consistently demonstrated a normal visual field, but left eye showed a progressively worsening global defect with poor reliability indices. At the present visit the patient performed VRP, which tested both eyes simultaneously. Good fixation with the right eye facilitated a reliable visual field of the left eye. Conclusions and importance: The virtual reality perimeters tests both eyes simultaneously, which traditional perimeters cannot do. In this case, fellow eye fixation facilitated the acquisition of a clinically meaningful visual field from a poorly fixing eye due to advanced glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.